Questions 1-10
11. Do I have to approve or sign the IEP
at the IEP meeting?
No. You have the right to take your IEP home to review it before
you sign. Your child remains eligible for special education and
stays in his current placement while you decide whether to consent. If
you do not consent or file for a fair hearing in a reasonable period of
time, then the LEA may file for a fair hearing. . [Source: “Special
Education Rights and Responsibilities,” Question 4-32, PAI CA].
Note: It is in your
child’s best interests to step back and take time to review the IEP
document, carefully considering what your child’s needs are and what
you have requested the district to provide to meet those needs.
Pressuring parents to sign IEPs before they have had the
opportunity to adequately review and digest their contents, and consider
the impact it will have on the child, is akin to a car salesman
pressuring a customer to close a deal without allowing them the
opportunity to look thoroughly under the hood of the car.
Insist upon your right to fully review the documents which govern
your child’s education.
As well, you can consent to
only part of an IEP. You
can consent to those parts of the IEP that you agree with, so those
services can begin. If you disagree with certain parts of the IEP, those
parts cannot be implemented and may be issues at a due process hearing
if your concerns cannot be resolved informally. You may wish to file a
written dissent with the IEP document to make your position clear. [Cal.
Ed. Code Sec. 56346.] A tool that can be used for when you disagree with
or “dissent” from the IEP contents is a “Parent
IEP Attachment” http://www.wrightslaw.com/advoc/tips/Judy_IEP_Attachment.html
which is described at Wrightslaw.
If you do not consent to all the components of the IEP, then those
components of the program to which you have consented shall be
implemented so as not to delay providing special education and related
services to your child. [Cal. Ed. Code Sec. 56346(a).]
If the public education agency determines that the part of the
proposed IEP to which you do not consent is necessary to provide a free
and appropriate education to your child, they shall initiate a
pre-hearing mediation conference, a mediation conference or a due
process hearing. While the pre-hearing mediation conference, mediation
conference or due process hearing is pending, your child shall remain in
his or her then-current placement, unless you and the public education
agency agree otherwise. [Cal. Ed. Code Sec. 56346(b).] . [Source:
“Special Education Rights and Responsibilities,” Question 4-33, PAI
CA].
Any parts of the IEP to which you have not consented may become the
basis for a due process fair hearing. [Cal. Ed. Code Sec. 56346.] In
addition to a due process fair hearing, several other dispute resolution
mechanisms exist but are at your option. See Chapter
6, Special Education Rights and Responsibilities, Information
on Due Process Hearings/Compliance Complaints.
http://www.pai-ca.org/pubs/504601.pdf
Federal law makes it clear that the local agency may initiate a due
process hearing to attempt to override your consent to initial
placement. State law provides the local agency the same option with
respect to portions of the IEP to which you have not consented. [34
C.F.R. Sec. 300.507(a); Cal. Ed. Code Sec. 56501(a).]
In addition, you may consent
to the content of the IEP as written, including the placement
recommendation yet you may disagree with the actual placement site or
classroom. For example, after visiting the proposed placement or
classroom, you may feel that it does not meet the requirements of the
IEP as written. Your disagreement with the actual classroom may become
the basis for a due process hearing if your concerns cannot be resolved
informally. See Chapter 6, Information on Due Process
Hearings/Compliance Complaints. [Source: “Special Education Rights
and Responsibilities,” Question 4-34, PAI CA].
You may also change your mind
after signing an IEP. If
you have changed your mind, you may revoke your consent at any time. [34
C.F.R. Sec. 300.500(b)(1)(iii).] You should immediately send a written
revocation of consent to the special education administrator who
represented the school district at the IEP meeting to ask that a new IEP
meeting be scheduled as soon as possible. You are entitled to an IEP
review meeting within 30 days of a written request, not counting days in
July or August. [Cal. Ed. Code Sec. 56343.5).] The district might not,
however, revert to implementing the previous IEP, especially if the new
IEP is already being implemented at the time you attempt to withdraw
consent or if any significant period of time has elapsed before the
revocation. At the IEP meeting, if there is a dispute about the child's
program or placement, it is unclear whether the "stay-put"
provision would apply to maintain the program as described by the IEP to
which you wish to withdraw consent or to the previous IEP. See Chapter
6, Information on Due Process Hearings/Compliance Complaints for
further information. As always, the best practice is not to
sign an IEP until you are sure about its contents. You need not sign
an IEP at the IEP meeting where it was developed. You can and should
take an IEP home to think about for a day or two if you are not sure you
should agree to it at the time of the IEP meeting. You can also sign an
IEP in part [Cal. Ed. Code Sec. 56346] as described in Questions 33 and
34. . [Source: “Special Education Rights and Responsibilities,”
Question 4-35, PAI CA].
Back
to Top
12. What is the "full continuum of
placements" that a school district must offer my child?
The continuum of placements must permit students to receive an
education to the maximum extent appropriate with children who do not
have disabilities. [34 C.F.R. Sec. 300.550.] See Chapter 7, Information
on Least Restrictive Environment. [Source: “Special Education
Rights and Responsibilities,” Question 4-36, PAI CA]. [See also FAQ
16, for more on “Least Restrictive Environment.”]
Federal law provides that each local education agency must ensure
that:
“to the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities,
including children in public or private institutions or other care
facilities, are educated with children who are not disabled, and special
classes, separate schooling or other removal of children with
disabilities from the regular educational environment occurs only when
the nature or severity of the disability is such that education in
regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot
be achieved satisfactorily. [20 U.S.C. Sec. 1412 (a)(5)(A); 34 C.F.R.
Sec. 300.550(b)(1) & (2); California Education Code (Cal. Ed. Code)
Sec. 56364]
School districts must offer a continuum of alternative placements,
including:
(1) Instruction in a regular classroom;
(2) Related services (in California, these are called
"designated instruction and services") necessary to help your
child benefit from special education (see FAQ 6, for more on “Related
Services”);
(3) Resource specialist services in which a school resource
specialist provides specialized instruction and services to children who
spend more than half their day in a regular classroom;
(4) Special day classes and centers in which a school provides
specialized instruction and services to children who spend less than
half their day in a regular classroom;
(5) State special schools, such as the California School for the Deaf
and California School for the Blind;
(6) Home instruction;
(7) Instruction in hospitals or institutions, such as medical
facilities, state hospitals and developmental centers, and juvenile
schools;
(8) Placement in appropriate nonpublic, non-sectarian schools when no
appropriate public school placement is available; and
(9) Out-of-home residential placement, including non-medical care and
room and board when educationally appropriate or when the only
appropriate school is too far away from your home;
(10) Itinerant instruction in classrooms, resource rooms, and
settings other than classrooms where specially-designed instruction may
occur;
(11) Instruction using telecommunication; and
(12) Instruction in settings other than classrooms where specially
designed instruction may occur.
[34 C.F.R. Secs. 300.26, 300.551; Cal. Ed. Code Secs. 56360, 56361,
and 56363.] ( For more specific information on individual types of
placements, see Cal. Ed. Code Secs. 56362 (resource specialist program),
56364 (special day class), 56367 (state special schools), 56365
(non-public schools), 56167 (medical institutions), 56850 (state
developmental centers and hospitals), 56150 (juvenile schools), and
56156 (out-of-home residential placements).
Note: Unfortunately,
school districts do not always provide accurate or complete information
about what these placement options are, including the fact that
necessary "supplementary aids and services" are supposed to be
attempted PRIOR to removing a child from the general education
classroom, and often provide parents with
information only about the placements the district wants to utilize for
the child. Far too often,
the placements the school district would choose are more restrictive
than a child truly needs. School
districts MUST provide services in settings and with people who can meet
your child’s IEP goals and objectives.
If a proposed classroom or teacher cannot meet your child’s
goals, you can ask the district to change them.
However, parents are well advised to observe the various
placement options under consideration including classrooms, programs or
services, before agreeing to a placement, especially if you have
concerns about its appropriateness.
Back
to Top
The program placement should be determined based on your child's
needs as described in his or her IEP. [34 C.F.R. Sec. 300.552.] The
intent of the law is that the program be based on the unique needs of
your child, rather than the programs available in the school district.
If a program which meets your child's unique needs does not exist, the
school district is required to secure a program (for example, starting a
new program, modifying an existing program, providing for an
interdistrict transfer or paying for a nonpublic school placement as
appropriate). [Source: “Special Education Rights and
Responsibilities,” Question 4-45, PAI CA].
Parents should also know that the law requires that they must be
active participants in any decisions the IEP team makes about the
educational placement of their child.
You have the right to obtain as much specific information as
possible about the recommended placements during your IEP meeting. Some
districts will tell you which placements (specific classrooms) they are
recommending and describe those classrooms. Other school districts will
recommend general placement categories (for example, resource
specialists, special day class). Then, specific classroom assignments
follow the IEP. Whichever procedure your district follows, you should
request at your IEP meeting that you be included, as the law requires,
in any meeting where the educational placement of your child is
determined. [20 U.S.C. Sec. 1414(f), 34 C.F.R. Sec. 300.501(c); Cal. Ed.
Code Sec. 56342.5.] [Source: “Special Education Rights and
Responsibilities,” Question 4-38, PAI CA].
Back
to Top
The IEP must be implemented as soon as possible following the
IEP meeting. There can be no undue delay in providing special education
and related services; however, the IEP must specify projected dates for
initiation of services. [34 C.F.R. Sec. 300.342, 300.347(a)(6); 5 C.C.R.
Sec. 3040.] . [Source: “Special Education Rights and Responsibilities,
Question 4-41, PAI CA].
Back
to Top
See WRIGHTSLAW:
All About Free Appropriate Public Education http://www.wrightslaw.com/info/fape.index.htm
Appropriate, as in Free Appropriate Public Education, means specialized instruction
and related services that are provided at public expense, under public
supervision and without charge. The instruction and services must meet
state standards, must include preschool, elementary and secondary school
education, and must be provided in conformity with an IEP that meets all
legal requirements. [34 C.F.R. Sec. 300.13.] The services must address
all of the child's identified special education and related service
needs, and the services and placement must be based on the child's
unique needs and not on her disability. [34 C.F.R. Sec. 300.300(a)(3).]
In 1982, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Board of
Education v. Rowley , 458 U.S. 176; 102 S. Ct. 3034; EHLR 553:656
declaring that under federal law an "appropriate" educational
program and placement is one that provides services to the disabled
student sufficient for her to obtain "educational benefit." It
does not entitle the student to the "best" possible
educational program or a "potential maximizing" education. The
Rowley case must be followed throughout the United States and was
specifically adopted by the federal courts governing California in
Gregory K. v. Longview School District, 811 F.2d 1307 (9th
Cir. 1987); EHLR 558:284. Specifically, in Rowley the Court was
considering a student with disabilities who was mainstreamed in general
education classes. For these students, the Rowley court said that
educational benefit usually means that the child is making passing
grades and is being promoted from grade to grade.
The courts are constantly exploring the meaning of "educational
benefit." Certainly, the plan of instruction and placement should
be likely to result in meaningful educational progress and not
regression or trivial educational advancement. [Polk v. Central
Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F.2d 171 (3d Cir. 1988).] In
California, educational benefit is measured by whether the child is
making meaningful progress toward achieving IEP goals and objectives. [County
of San Diego v. Cal. Special Ed. Hearing Office, 93 F.3d 1458 (9th
Cir. 1996), 24 IDELR 756; Taylor v. Honig, 910 F.2d 627, 629 (9th
Cir. 1990), 16 EHLR 1138.]
Back
to Top
Least Restrictive Environment is defined in IDEA regulations. Go to
the IDEA
practices website and locate Sections 300.550-300.553.
Spring 2001- SPecial EDge Newsletter on the LRE Spring
2001
SPecial EDge Insert on the LRE Special
LRE Insert
Wested LRE
Resources Project
Federal law provides that each local education agency must ensure
that:
“to the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities,
including children in public or private institutions or other care
facilities, are educated with children who are not disabled, and special
classes, separate schooling or other removal of children with
disabilities from the regular educational environment occurs only when
the nature or severity of the disability is such that education in
regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot
be achieved satisfactorily. [20 U.S.C. Sec. 1412 (a)(5)(A); 34 C.F.R.
Sec. 300.550(b)(1) & (2); California Education Code (Cal. Ed. Code)
Sec. 56364]
State law provides that special education students be provided with
"maximum interaction with the general school population" as
appropriate. [Cal. Ed. Code Sec. 56001(g).] Further, state policy
provides that special education students "should receive their
education in chronologically age appropriate environments with
non-handicapped peers." [CDE, Office of Special Education, Policy
Statement on Least Restrictive Environment (October 10, 1986).] This
means, for example, that a 10-year-old student with disabilities should
attend public school at a local elementary campus with other nondisabled
students of the same age. Depending on the student's individual needs,
he could be fully included in a regular classroom with support services,
mainstreamed, attend a special class, or be placed in a combination of
both as appropriate.
This does not mean that all students must attend regular education
classes or attend school at regular education campuses. Depending on the
student's individual needs, as documented by the IEP team, he may need
to receive educational programming in a self-contained classroom or at a
special school, nonpublic school or residential facility.
Systematic efforts on the part of special and regular educators
should be made to promote positive interactions between students with
disabilities (severely disabled and learning disabled) and their
nondisabled peers. See
Chapter 7, http://www.pai-ca.org/pubs/504701.pdf
“Special
Education Rights and Responsibilities,”
Information on Least
Restrictive Environment.
The following is an excerpt from an article
entitled
“MORE ON
THE LRE, LEAST
RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT, FROM REED MARTIN, ESQ.”
“The
measure is regular transportation, to a regular classroom, with regular
students, regular curriculum, access to regular non-academic activities,
access to extra-curricular activities, and access to the benefits of all
programs and services of the school district.
Any problem arising from a disability that keeps a student from
each of the above goals must be reflected in the baseline of need, the
outcome desired, and specifically what needs to be programmed for.
If a student cannot productively take a regular bus to school as
the other children do, because of a disability, that needs to be
programmed for because it is a barrier to full enjoyment of the
educational experience now and employability, access to recreation and
leisure in the community and independent living later. If a student,
because of a disability, cannot get his homework assignment, take the
needed books home, do the expected
homework and turn it in when he returns to school the next day,
that needs to be programmed for because it affects inclusion in a
regular class today and affects employability and access to further
education and training later.
The
focus, whether in the IDEA, Section 504 or the ADA, has moved completely
from serving the child in the special education environment to
empowering the student as they transition
through the regular education environment and into the regular
community.
Senator Stafford, offering an "inclusion" amendment to
the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, saw clearly 25 years
into the future: "We are concerned that children with handicapping
conditions be educated in the most normal possible and least restrictive
setting, for how else will they adapt to the world beyond the
educational environment, and how else will the non-handicapped adapt to
them?" [120 Cong. Rec. S. 8438 (May 20,1974].
When
your child's annual goals are related to academics that are objectively
measurable, the goal should be to raise the student to grade level
equivalency -- just like any other student in regular education.
A common
problem for many students with special needs, as acknowledged by
Congress in the 1997 IDEA, is the lowering of expectations by regular
education teachers. Students are often allowed to progress at a slower
rate so you should make sure the goal for your child is to achieve one
grade level of growth for each year of instruction.
If
your child's disability makes that difficult then that is exactly what
evaluation is to explore, it is exactly what the IEP committee is to
discuss and it is exactly what the Comprehensive System of Personnel
Development is required for -- to acquire and disseminate promising
educational practices that will enable your child's teachers to attempt
to enable your child to have the same rate of accomplishment as other
children in the class.
It is
common to see regular education teachers expecting students with special
needs to have a difficult time and to be performing below grade level.
So if your child's evaluation shows a deficit, for example in reading of
several years below the grade level of the rest of the class, then your
goal should be more than one year's growth for one year of instruction
-- it should be to get up to grade level. Your child has a right to the
same goals and expectations of everyone else in regular education. Being
behind in reading will drag your child behind in everything.
Worse,
being behind in a regular class can lead to teasing by other students in
the class and that must be addressed as well. Recent federal court cases
such as Leslie B. v. Winnacunnet
Coop. Sch. Dist., 28 IDELR 271 (D.NH 1998) showed that regular
education teachers could be liable, as well as the school district being
liable, when a student is allowed to fall behind and allowed to be
teased to the point that they can no longer attend school.
Some
school personnel seem to accept performance below grade level for
students with disabilities who are being served in regular classes, but
the U.S. Supreme Court does not find that acceptable. The U.S. Supreme Court in Board of
Education v. Rowley, at pages 203-04, defined the Congressional
requirement for grade level equivalency. "Regular examinations are
administered, grades are awarded, and yearly advancement to higher grade
levels is permitted for those children who attain an adequate knowledge
of the course material. The grading and advancement system thus
constitutes an important factor in determining educational benefit.
Children who graduate from our public school system are considered by
our society to have been educated at least to the grade level they have
completed." The Court goes on to say that the specially designed
education "must meet the state's educational standards" and
"must approximate the grade levels used in the state's regular
education."
The
Supreme Court continues: "The IEP, and therefore the personalized
instruction, should be formulated in accordance with the requirements of
the Act, and, if the child is being educated in the regular classroom of
the public education system, should be reasonably calculated to enable
the child to achieve passing marks and advance from grade to
grade."
No
more fake "A's" and no more fake "promotion." The
school has to produce on goals of raising the student to grade level
equivalency.”
Back
to Top
17. How do I make a referral for my child
to receive special education services?
To refer your child for special education services, write a letter to
your child's teacher, principal or special education administrative
office. Tell the school district that you are concerned about your
child's educational progress. Say that you are making a referral for
assessment for special education services. You may also want to let the
district know that you are looking forward to receiving an assessment
plan within 15 days of the district's receipt of your letter. Keep a
copy of this request and any other correspondence with the school
district. If you call to make a referral, school district personnel must
by law assist you to put your request in writing. If
the school district refers your child for special education, it is still
critical that you follow up with your own written request. Your
written referral will ensure that assessment and IEP timelines will
begin. [Cal. Ed. Code Sec. 56029, 56302; 5 C.C.R. Sec. 3021.] [[Source:
“Special Education Rights and Responsibilities, Question 1-11, PAI
CA].
Back
to Top
18. How do I
locate someone to assess my child if I want an independent assessment
done? How do I find local service providers for my child?
One thing parents can do is use a
database available from the California Dept. of Education, Special
Education Division (which you can access here http://www2.otan.dni.us/npsa/npsa_search.taf ) which makes available a directory of services provided by
certified nonpublic, nonsectarian schools and agencies and includes
information on disabling conditions, age ranges, co-ed or single-sex
enrollment.
In addition, many ASK families have used the professionals whose names
are provided below. Please
note that ASK’s listing of these individuals and organizations is
neither an express or implied endorsement nor recommendation of any of
these individuals or organizations, rather an offer of information
regarding resources that are available in our local area.
Independent psycho-educational and/or neuro-developmental assessments
are available through:
Susan McNary- (310) 540-5340
Carol Edwards- (310) 544-5651
Claudia McCulloch- (310) 514-2200.
Pam Ajang- (310) 378-5020
Robert Byrd- (310) 899-9699 or (800) 301-1802
Nancy Harjani- (310) 899-9699 or (310) 225-2130
The H.E.L.P. Group, Neuropsychology Program – (818) 781-0360 www.thehelpgroup.org
UCLA Neuro.Psych. Institute – (310) 825-0511
Dr. Rita Eichenstein 310 202-6301
LA-area ABA providers and
independent psychological evaluations
Psychiatrists:
Dr. Michael Fitzpatrick, MD 310 318-9089
Dr. Steve Lawrence, MD 310 542-7878
(If you believe your child may have a developmental disability, you can
also contact the local regional center for an assessment. [See FAQ 20,
below, for information about “Regional Centers”].
You may also want to consider making a request at an IEP for an
assessment to be done by one of the CDE-sponsored Diagnostic Centers.
School districts must make the request, but an assessment that is done
by the Diagnostic Center is done at NO COST to the school district.
Please note that there is typically a waiting list for
assessment. The Southern
California Diagnostic Center can be accessed here http://www.dcs-cde.ca.gov/
Please be aware that the Diagnostic Center is a branch of the California
Department of Education thus is aligned with school districts. As such
it should not be considered an "independent evaluator" as that
term is used in 34 CFR 300.502 Go to IDEA
Practices and locate 300.502
Behavioral
Intervention, ABA/DTT
BECA (Behavioral Education for Children with Autism)
21250 Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 500
Torrance, CA 90503
Phone: (310) 545-1237
CARD
(Center for Autism and Related Disorders)
Dr. Doreen Granpeesheh
23300 Ventura
Blvd.,
Woodland Hills, CA 91364
PHONE: (818) 223-0123
Email: cardla@aol.com
C.A.R.D.
in Torrance: (310) 944-9809
LIFE
(The Lovaas Institute for Early Intervention)
2566 Overland Avenue Suite 500
Los Angeles, CA 90064
PHONE:(310) 840-5983
The Lovaas Institute for Early Intervention,
or LIFE, is a small
researched-based psychology
clinic in the Los Angeles area that
specializes in
developing and implementing behavior modification
treatment programs for children with autism.
Email: info@lovaas.com
RAE
(Resources in Autism Education)
Sabrina Marasovich
4455 Torrance Blvd., Suite 801
Torrance, CA 90503-4335.
PHONE:(310) 791-2062
Email: serviceinfo@autismed.com
Working
With Autism Inc.
Jennifer Sabin
16530 Ventura Blvd Suite # 310
Encino, Ca 91436
PHONE: (818) 501-4240
Wayne
Tashjian, M.F.T.
15720 Ventura Blvd., Suite 606
Encino, CA 91436
(818) 788-2388
Autism Spectrum Therapies:
www.autismtherapies.com
6035 Bristol Parkway, Suite 200
Culver City, CA 90230
Tel (310) 641-1100
Fax (310) 641-1174
Autism Partnership- (562) 431-9293
Looking Glass Children’s Services- (323) 295-4722
IABA, Inst. For Applied Behavior Analysis:
(310) 649-0499
Autism Behavior Consultants
3440 Torrance Blvd. Suite 104
Torrance, CA 90503
(310) 937-3633
|
Educational
Therapists
Susan Charles- (310) 379-0564
Ginny Erxleben, Center for Learning Unlimited
(310)
544-1644
Vicky Ebeling- (310) 375-4790
Lisa Nicolello- (310) 377-1872
Lois Hillman- (310) 541-6332
Joan Reitter- (310) 791-8585
Joy Mann- (310) 375-7149
OT/PT,
Social Skills
Sensory Integration International/Ayres Clinic
(310) 320-2335
PTN- Pediatric Therapy Network- (310) 328-0276
Can Do Kids- (310) 204-8999
Lifespan Therapeutics
Marianne
O’Brien Gordon
25550 Hawthorne Blvd, Suite 209
Torrance, CA 90505
(310) 698-4353
Marcie
Rhee, DPT, PCS
Director
310-371-8555 phone
310-371-4488 fax
info@mykidsinmotion.com email
www.mykidsinmotion.com website
Therapy West- (310) 337-7115
Rebekah S. Tolin, OTR/L
Phone (917) 327-5837
Email rtolin@hotmail.com
Speech
Therapy
Maureen Johnston- (310) 378-0036
Lynne Alba- (310) 257-8506
Lifespan Therapeutics
Marianne O’Brien Gordon
25550 Hawthorne Blvd, Suite 209
Torrance, CA 90505
(310) 698-4353
Janice DeMore- (310) 373-7599
Donita Teft- (310) 379-7732
Consultant for speech- Susan Myers-Fosnot- (818) 884-9110
Lauri Allen, MA, CCC-SP 4girlsmom@email.com
Consultant and Assessment for Speech and
Language
Karen Schnee, MA, CCC-SLP : 818 363-1912
Independent
Consultants
David Sponder- (310) 521-0112 (autism/behavior)
Scott Shepard- (818) 589-0497 (autism/behavior/inclusion)
Rick Clemens- (805) 985-4808 (inclusion, curricular
modifications)
Mary Falvey- (323) 343-4406 (inclusion, curricular modifications
etc)
Richard Rosenberg- (562) 698-8121 (inclusion, transition)
Lynn Smithey- (310) 230-1780 (inclusion, curricular
modifications)
Trang Nguyen, O.D., F.A.A.O.
Vision enhancement; visual perception testing; functional vision
assessments
2901 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 100
Santa Monica, CA 90403
310-449-0066
Dr.
Albert K. Chun, O.D.
3537 Torrance Blvd. Suite 18
Torrance, CA 90503
(310) 543-3555
http://www.optometrists.org/southbayoptometry/
Scotopic
Sensitivity Syndrome
Rosalyn
Firemark, M.A.
Audiology Consultants
3440 Lomita Blvd. #432
Torrance, CA 90505
310-534-5949
Carol Atkins, MA, CCC-A,
Audiology Processing Disorder
949-951-3362
Miscellaneous
Resources
Brain Gym® International
EEG Spectrum International
Welcome
To Brain Place
Irlen Institute
HALO (Helping Autism through Learning and
Outreach)
(866) 465-9595
website: www.halo-soma.org
Contact person: Linda Lange, director
|
Back
to Top
19.
If I need a lawyer or a professional advocate, who can I call?
Protection and
Advocacy [PAI] at (213) 427-8747 and TASK
(Team of Advocates for Special Kids) (714) 533-TASK, or OCRA,
Office of Clients Rights Advocacy, (800) 390-7032,
offer no or low cost legal assistance.
Also
check the following websites:
http://www.fetaweb.com/help/ca.htm
http://home.san.rr.com/via/SPECIALEDUCATION/spedatty.htm
Back
to Top
20.
What is "regional center?"
To
learn more about the California Regional Center System, you may access
this site http://www.pai-ca.org/pubs/506301.html
and learn about the regional centers and “Rights Under
the Lanterman Act”:
Regional Centers serving the South Bay area are: Harbor
Regional Center
21231 Hawthorne Blvd., Torrance, CA 90503-5591, (310) 540-1171; and
Westside Regional Center, 5901 Green Valley Circle, 3rd Floor, Culver
City, CA 90230, (310) 337-1155.
The
Department of Developmental Services (DDS) contracts with Regional
Centers to provide services to people with developmental disabilities.
Regional Centers are private, nonprofit corporations. There are 21
Regional Centers in California, each serving a specific geographic area.
Appendix C, “Rights Under the Lanterman Act” at the above website
gives a complete list of the regional centers with their addresses and
telephone numbers.
The
Regional Center is the main point of contact in your community to ensure
that you and your family receive the services and supports you want and
need. The Regional Center provides some services itself.
It also helps you get services from other agencies. § 4620. The
regional center is required to develop an Individual Program Plan (IPP)
with you. The plan must list the services you need. § 4646. See Rights
Under the Lanterman Act, Chapter Four for a discussion of developing
IPPs. Some kinds of services are so special that they can only be
provided through the Regional Center.
Regional
Centers do not directly provide most services and supports. They buy the
services you need from private agencies or help you get them from
government agencies. The person directly responsible for actually
helping to plan for and find the services and supports you need is a
social worker, known as your service coordinator (sometimes called a
"case manager"). § 4647.
There
is more information about getting the services you want and need from
the Regional Center and other agencies in Chapter Four. Sometimes, one
agency may have more contact and importance in your life than another.
For example, during your school years, the local school district has
responsibility for special education and a number of other services.
When you leave school, you may get more services and supports from
another agency or from the regional center.
Back
to Top
21.
What is SELPA?
SELPA
is the Special Education Local Planning Area. The SELPA supervises the
planning and implementation of special education laws and programs in
the area. Our local SELPA is the Southwest SELPA, which is involved with
the 12 school districts in the South Bay. The Southwest SELPA is located
at 1401 Inglewood Ave., Redondo Beach, CA 90278, (310) 798-2731; fax
(310) 798-2978; Resource Center, (310) 798-2965.
The
Southwest SELPA Director is Bob Farran.
SELPA's website is www.swselpa.org.
Back
to Top
22. How do I become an ASK E-group
member? How do I
access and use the e-group for additional resources and information and
to communicate with other ASK members?
The ASK E-Group is a separate web site designed to allow members to
communicate with each other and to receive messages about local school
district information and related special education issues. If you live
in the Los Angeles area, and would like to become a member of the ASK
E-group, go here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ASK_group/
Follow the directions to request to become a member. Your request should
be processed within a few days of receipt..
Once you are a notified that you are a member of the group, go to the
site again. On the right side
of the page it will tell you that you are a member, and will ask you to sign in.
Give yourself a sign-in name. For example, Dona is donaw01. Then,
give yourself a password and ask your computer to save it so you do not
have to sign in every time you go to the site.
If you already have another YAHOO member sign in name, it will tell you
that you need to use the Conversion Wizard to have access to the ASK
E-group. If this occurs,
just follow the directions for the Conversion Wizard.
Once you have signed in and have a password, you can see all of the
saved messages and resources/information that have been archived for ASK
Members. You will also have access to all of the other member names and
e-mail addresses so that you can communicate directly with other ASK
E-group members.
IMPORTANT!!! When you have a question you would like to
present to the group, use the search function or scan the messages to
see if your question has already been raised and responded to before
prior to sending a message out to the group. That way questions aren’t
repeated and unnecessary e-mails aren't required.
We have designed the ASK E-group to help you find the information quickly
for yourself.
If you wish to communicate with an individual member of the
e-group, you can communicate with them directly by going into the site,
clicking "Members," scrolling down until you see the name of
the member you wish to communicate with, and then clicking on the name
and sending the message. This allows for direct communication between
members without sending messages to all the members.
Of course, you can also send an e-mail directly from your
personal e-mail to another e-groups member’s personal e-mail.
If you wish to send a message to the entire ASK e-group, you should send
it to ASK_group@yahoogroups.com
Be sure and save or bookmark this e-mail address in your address book.
Messages to the entire ASK E-group should be general inquiries about
a particular subject of interest, i.e., local practitioners of a
particular intervention, good speech teachers, etc.
It can be to inquire about someone, a service, or just to pose a
general question or comment to the group. PLEASE use the Yahoo Group
resources (archives and search function) prior to sending a message, as you will save yourself and
others time and trouble by not repeating questions that have already
been asked and answered in previous postings.
PLEASE NOTE: If you hit the “Reply” button in response to an ASK
E-group message, ALL members will see your response!
If you wish to keep your communication confidential to the
original writer, or wish to send any information that is personal and
confidential, please send them to personal e-mail addresses.
If you wish to reach ASK contacts, send messages to our personal
e-mails or contact us through the web site.
Back to Top
|